Social Policy, Federalism Disputes and the Courts: Vancouver’s Safe Injection Site as a Case Study in Canadian Multilevel Governance [Prepared for presentation at ―Comparing Modes of Governance in Canada and the European Union: Social Policy Engagement across Complex

نویسندگان

  • Emmett Macfarlane
  • Tony Clement
چکیده

Insite, established as the first supervised injection facility in North America, was a pilot project developed in 2003 in response to the rampant drug use that marked the Downtown Eastside (DTES) neighbourhood of Vancouver. Once considered a vibrant city centre, the DTES underwent a considerable economic and social downturn through the 1960s and 1970s as the downtown core migrated west. The DTES is marked by high rates of poverty, alcoholism, drug abuse, prostitution, violence, disease, and mental illness. The City of Vancouver did not have the resources or jurisdiction necessary to address these issues on their own. Following a spike in drug-related deaths in the 1990s that were characterized as an epidemic, in 1998 the city approved of a program of strategic actions focused on the DTES. The city then negotiated ―The Vancouver Agreement‖ with the federal government and the province of British Columbia to support plans for economic, social and community development. 1 One of the central elements of the Agreement‘s health priorities was an emphasis on harm reduction, referred to as one of the ―four pillars‖ of the governments‘ anti-drug strategy. 2 In 2002 Larry Campbell was elected mayor of Vancouver after pledging to open a supervised injection facility. Opening Insite required the cooperation of the federal and provincial governments and the local health authority (the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority). Most significantly, in June 2003, the federal minister of health granted the facility a three-year exemption under section 56 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) to allow the site to open. The exemption was intended to facilitate scientific research on harm reduction. Insite opened three months later. Health Canada also provided $500,000 per year for the first three years of the pilot project‘s operation. BC‘s Ministry of Health contributed the remainder of the funding to the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, which, in conjunction with the Portland Hotel Society – a non-profit organization dedicated to social housing – operates Insite. Further, the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS was commissioned to conduct research to evaluate the facility. The Conservative Party of Canada won the 2006 federal election, succeeding the Liberal government. Though the new government decided to end federal funding of Insite, Health Minister Tony Clement provided a 16 month extension of the CDSA exemption to allow for further research. In October, 2007 the exemption was again extended, this time until June, 2008.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Policy Capacity for Health Reform: Necessary but Insufficient; Comment on “Health Reform Requires Policy Capacity”

Forest and colleagues have persuasively made the case that policy capacity is a fundamental prerequisite to health reform. They offer a comprehensive life-cycle definition of policy capacity and stress that it involves much more than problem identification and option development. I would like to offer a Canadian perspective. If we define health reform as re-orienting the health system from acut...

متن کامل

Governing Collaborative Healthcare Improvement: Lessons From an Atlantic Canadian Case

The Atlantic Healthcare Collaboration for Innovation and Improvement in Chronic Disease (AHC) Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) in Eastern Canada provided an approach to spur system-level reform across multiple health systems for patients and families living with chronic disease. Developed and led by senior executives with a unique governance approach and involving clinical front-line tea...

متن کامل

Governance Must Dive Into Organizations to Make a Real Difference; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”

In their 2016 article, Saltman and Duran provide a thoughtful examination of the governance challenges involved in different care delivery models adopted in primary care and hospitals in two European countries. This commentary examines the limited potential of structural changes to achieve real reform and considers that, unless governance arrangements actually succeed in penetrating organizatio...

متن کامل

All Health Partnerships, Great and Small: Comparing Mandated With Emergent Health Partnerships; Comment on “Evaluating Global Health Partnerships: A Case Study of a Gavi HPV Vaccine Application Process in Uganda”

The plurality of healthcare providers and funders in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has given rise to an era in which health partnerships are becoming the norm in international development. Whether mandated or emergent, three common drivers are essential for ensuring successful health partnerships: trust; a diverse and inclusive network; and a clear governance structure. Mandated and ...

متن کامل

Current Models of Investor State Dispute Settlement Are Bad for Health: The European Union Could Offer an Alternative; Comment on “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?”

In this commentary, we endorse concerns about the health impact of the trans-pacific partnership (TPP), paying particular attention to its mechanisms for investor state dispute settlement. We then describe the different, judgeled approach being advocated by the European Commission team negotiating the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, arguing that, while not perfect, it offers si...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011